Back to Pregena

AAC-T Clinical Evidence

18 controlled clinical studies · 9,000+ patients studied · 80+ published studies · 5,000+ patients treated · 2006 to present

Clinical Pregnancy Rates: Control vs AAC-T

Per-Study Breakdown

Published Studies

Author Year Publication Population N Control CPR AAC-T CPR Improvement

Meta-Analyses and Systematic Reviews

15 independent meta-analyses confirming PBMC efficacy for recurrent implantation failure.

Author Year Journal Studies Patients CPR LBR
Wu2019Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics6718OR 2.45OR 2.43
Maleki-Hajiagha2019Journal of Reproductive Immunology81,028RR 1.92RR 1.93
Yakin2019Scientific Reports5695OR 1.65OR 1.65 (NS)
Yang2019Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology5707RR 2.48RR 1.98
Achilli2018Fertility and Sterility6658OR 3.28–
Pourmoghadam2020Journal of Reproductive Immunology51,086OR 3.57–
Busnelli2021Scientific Reports6795RR 2.18RR 2.41
Qin2021Journal of Reproductive Immunology7864OR 3.43OR 2.79
Jin2022Frontiers in Endocrinology213,079OR 2.79OR 2.55
Liu2022Scientific Reports162,008OR 2.44OR 2.86
Kong2023Journal of Reproductive Immunology212,917––
He2023Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics15429,906OR 2.95OR 2.40
Xie2024Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology567,898OR 3.03OR 2.23
Chow2025International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine101,335RR 2.12–
Jiang2025Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics253,035––

CPR = Clinical Pregnancy Rate · LBR = Live Birth Rate · OR = Odds Ratio · RR = Relative Risk · NS = Not Significant. Purple values indicate statistically significant improvements. Kong 2023 and Jiang 2025 are network meta-analyses that ranked therapies but did not report pooled effect sizes vs control.